> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 4:57 PM
> To: Opensource [James Seong-Won Ban]
> Cc: Liam Girdwood; Support Opensource; LKML; David Dajun Chen
> Subject: Re: your mail
> 
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:03:32AM +0900, James Ban wrote:
> 
> > > > +       ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, DA9211_REG_EVENT_B, &reg_val);
> > > > +       if (ret < 0)
> > > > +               goto error_i2c;
> 
> > > > +       if (reg_val & DA9211_E_OV_CURR_A) {
> 
> > > > +       if (reg_val & DA9211_E_OV_CURR_B) {
> 
> > > > +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> 
> > > This is buggy - the driver should only return IRQ_HANDLED if it
> > > handled the interrupt somehow, otherwise it should return IRQ_NONE
> > > and let the interrupt core handle things.  This is especially
> > > important since the device appears to require that interrupts are
> > > explicitly acknoweldged so if something is flagged but not handled the
> interrupt will just sit constantly asserted.
> 
> > Basically all interrupts are masked when the chip wakes up.
> > Only two interrupts are unmasked at the start of driver like below.
> 
> I know that's the intention but the code should still be written robustly -
> something might go wrong somewhere which causes another interrupt to be
> enabled, or we might even gain support for shared threaded interrupts in the
> interrupt core and someone could then try to use that in a system.
How about below code for proper handle of interrupt?
static irqreturn_t da9211_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
{
        struct da9211 *chip = data;
        int reg_val, ret;

        ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, DA9211_REG_EVENT_B, &reg_val);
        if (ret < 0)
                goto error_i2c;

        if (reg_val & DA9211_E_OV_CURR_A) {
                regulator_notifier_call_chain(chip->rdev[0],
                        REGULATOR_EVENT_OVER_CURRENT,
                        rdev_get_drvdata(chip->rdev[0]));

                ret = regmap_write(chip->regmap, DA9211_REG_EVENT_B,
                        DA9211_E_OV_CURR_A);
                if (ret < 0)
                        goto error_i2c;

                return IRQ_HANDLED;
        }
        else if (reg_val & DA9211_E_OV_CURR_B) {
                regulator_notifier_call_chain(chip->rdev[1],
                        REGULATOR_EVENT_OVER_CURRENT,
                        rdev_get_drvdata(chip->rdev[1]));

                ret = regmap_write(chip->regmap, DA9211_REG_EVENT_B,
                        DA9211_E_OV_CURR_B);
                if (ret < 0)
                        goto error_i2c;

                return IRQ_HANDLED;
        }
        else
                return IRQ_NONE;

error_i2c:
        dev_err(chip->dev, "I2C error : %d\n", ret);
        return IRQ_NONE;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to