On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:00:51PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday March 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So here's a first cut at how this 2.6 -stable release process is going
> > to work that Chris and I have come up with. Does anyone have any
> > problems/issues/questions with this?
>
> One rule that I thought would make sense, but that I don't see listed
> is:
>
> - must fix a regression
That, and a zillion other specific wordings that people suggested fall
under the:
or some "oh, that's not good" issue
rule.
I didn't feel like being all lawyer-like and explicitly spelling out all
of the different kinds of bugs that we would be accepting patches for :)
So yes, I don't have a problem with patches to fix regressions.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
