On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:32:49 +0200 Boris BREZILLON <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:25:38 +0200 > Boris BREZILLON <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This patch series introduce the notion of irq fixups for atmel SoCs. > > > > In most at91 SoCs the first interrupt line is shared by several IPs, and > > some of these HW blocks might be in an unknown state when booting the > > Linux kernel. > > Hence these IPs might generate spurious interrupts if they've not masked > > their irqs and the shared irq line is requested by another peripheral. > > > > These fixups were previously done in arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c > > but as we're trying to use standard implementation (IRQCHIP_DECLARE and > > automatic call of irqchip_init within arch/arm/kernel/irq.c) we need to > > do those fixups in the irqchip driver. > > This is what I was talking about: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/271425.htm > > Oops, sorry this is not the appropriate thread: I meant to send this reply to this series: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/271413.html -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
