On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:10:24 +0200 Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Fabian Frederick <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fix checkpatch warnings: > > "WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf" > > Can you explain why seq_puts() is preferred over seq_printf()? - puts is presumably faster - puts doesn't go rogue if you accidentally pass it a "%". - this patch actually made fs/ubifs/super.o 12 bytes smaller. Perhaps because seq_printf() is a varargs function, forcing the caller to pass args on the stack instead of in registers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
