On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 17:28 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Toshi Kani <[email protected]> wrote: : > > In this patch, I left using reserve_ram_pages_type() since I do not see > > much reason to use WT for RAM, either. > > I hereby predict that someone, some day, will build a system with > nonvolatile "RAM", and someone will want this feature. Just saying :) > > More realistically, someone might want to write a silly driver that > lets programs mmap some WT memory for testing.
Agreed. This limitation needs to be addressed. I meant to say that this could be a separate effort. Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
