In blk-mq.c blk_mq_alloc_tag_set, if:
        set->tags = kmalloc_node()
succeeds, but one of the blk_mq_init_rq_map() calls fails,
        goto out_unwind;
needs to free set->tags so the caller is not obligated
to do so.  None of the current callers (null_blk,
virtio_blk, virtio_blk, or the forthcoming scsi-mq)
do so.

set->tags needs to be set to NULL after doing so,
so other tag cleanup logic doesn't try to free
a stale pointer later.  Also set it to NULL
in blk_mq_free_tag_set.

Tested with error injection on the forthcoming
scsi-mq + hpsa combination.

Signed-off-by: Robert Elliott <elli...@hp.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index ad69ef6..4a24b97 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1996,6 +1996,8 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
 out_unwind:
        while (--i >= 0)
                blk_mq_free_rq_map(set, set->tags[i], i);
+       kfree(set->tags);
+       set->tags = NULL;
 out:
        return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -2011,6 +2013,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
        }
 
        kfree(set->tags);
+       set->tags = NULL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_free_tag_set);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to