On Wed 16-07-14 17:36:49, David Rientjes wrote:
> Setting vm_dirty_bytes and dirty_background_bytes is not protected by any 
> serialization.
> 
> Therefore, it's possible for either variable to change value after the 
> test in global_dirty_limits() to determine whether available_memory needs 
> to be initialized or not.
> 
> Always ensure that available_memory is properly initialized.
> 
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

Makes sense to me
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

> ---
>  mm/page-writeback.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -261,14 +261,11 @@ static unsigned long global_dirtyable_memory(void)
>   */
>  void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
>  {
> +     const unsigned long available_memory = global_dirtyable_memory();
>       unsigned long background;
>       unsigned long dirty;
> -     unsigned long uninitialized_var(available_memory);
>       struct task_struct *tsk;
>  
> -     if (!vm_dirty_bytes || !dirty_background_bytes)
> -             available_memory = global_dirtyable_memory();
> -
>       if (vm_dirty_bytes)
>               dirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
>       else

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to