From: Lukas Czerner <lczer...@redhat.com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit 09869de57ed2728ae3c619803932a86cb0e2c4f8 upstream.
DM thinp already checks whether the discard_granularity of the data
device is a factor of the thin-pool block size. But when using the
dm-thin-pool's discard passdown support, DM thinp was not selecting the
max of the underlying data device's discard_granularity and the
thin-pool's block size.
Update set_discard_limits() to set discard_granularity to the max of
these values. This enables blkdev_issue_discard() to properly align the
discards that are sent to the DM thin device on a full block boundary.
As such each discard will now cover an entire DM thin-pool block and the
block will be reclaimed.
Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabe...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczer...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snit...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz>
---
drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
index e4cc196634c1..f8c36d30eca8 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
@@ -2695,7 +2695,8 @@ static void set_discard_limits(struct pool_c *pt, struct
queue_limits *limits)
*/
if (pt->adjusted_pf.discard_passdown) {
data_limits = &bdev_get_queue(pt->data_dev->bdev)->limits;
- limits->discard_granularity = data_limits->discard_granularity;
+ limits->discard_granularity =
max(data_limits->discard_granularity,
+ pool->sectors_per_block <<
SECTOR_SHIFT);
} else
limits->discard_granularity = pool->sectors_per_block <<
SECTOR_SHIFT;
}
--
2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
