We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <benoit.ta...@lip6.fr>
---
Tested by compilation without errors.
drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c | 2 +-
drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c
index 18dcb58..a0d1f57 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c
@@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ ips_link_to_i915_driver(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ips_link_to_i915_driver);
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ips_id_table) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id ips_id_table[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_THERMAL_SENSOR), },
{ 0, }
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
index 76ca094..66a4d32 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static void ipc_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
intel_scu_devices_destroy();
}
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pci_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[] = {
{
PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_LINCROFT),
(kernel_ulong_t)&intel_scu_ipc_lincroft_pdata,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
