On 07/18/2014 04:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/18/14 15:42, John Stultz wrote: >> If its a regression (and needs -stable backports) it needs to go in via >> tip/timers/urgent, and not via the regular merge window. >> >> Whats the additional risk -stable wise for canceling the timer during >> suspend and starting it back up during resume? >> > I'd say close to zero given that we'd only be making the timer run a > little bit later and we have slack in there already. Here's that version.
Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a closer review it and get it queued. Is there anyone who might be able to validate this and provide a Tested-by: ? thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/