On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Thats why moving the eye candy console into user space is such a good
> > > > > idea. You don't have to run it 8) It also means that the console
> > > > > development is accessible to all the crazy rasterman types.
> > > >
> > > > Yep. The basic console we already have. Everyone who wants eye candy
> > > > can switch
> > > > from basic console to user space console in early userspace.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Heh, I'm afraid it does not work like that. Anyone who wants eye-candy
> > > simply applies broken patch to their kernel... unless their distribution
> > > applied one
> > > already.
> > >
> > > Situation where we have one working eye-candy patch would certainly
> > > be an improvement.
> >
> > Why do we need patches in the kernel. Just set you config to
> > CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE, CONFIG_FB, CONFIG_INPUT and don't set fbcon or
> > vgacon. Then have a userspace app using /dev/fb and /dev/input create a
> > userland console. There is no need to do special hacks in the kernel.
>
> Except that I'll not get usefull reports from Oopsen and panic's,
> right? Ideally I'd also like high-priority kernel messages to be
> displayed during boot.
Indeed. I thought the idea was to use the existing fbcon support to draw
emergency messages to the screen.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
