On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 04:47:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So we really have to have -all- the CPUs be idle to turn off the timekeeper.
That seems to be pretty unavoidable any which way around. > This won't make the battery-powered embedded guys happy... > > Other thoughts on this? We really should not be setting > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE by default until this is solved. What are those same guys doing with nohz_full to begin with?
pgp8PdmEOZCwS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
