On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 14:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > The MISSING_BREAK / fallthrough test does not support
> > > gcc's extension for case labels with ranges.
> []
> > Yep, that's much worse [1] - I wish I never mentioned it. ;)
>
> I'm glad you did actually.
>
> The code itself:
>
> bool foo(int bar)
> {
> case (bar) {
> case 1:
> case 2:
> case 4:
> return true;
> default:
> return false;
> }
>
> should not emit any error.
That's why I submitted the report.
> I'll fix it soon.
Brilliant, thanks Joe!
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
