On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Steve French wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 09:36, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
> > Would it be useful if I split the second patch into a few parts for you? I 
> 
> For the second patch (the one I did not apply) slightly smaller would
> make things easier.  For patches that have non-trivial changes - my
> preference is to split the patches into the 50-200 line range since they
> can be reviewed and put in incrementally.
> 
I'll sort that out and send you such patches later this evening.


> those servers easily accessible to test against.   I am especially interested 
> in test feedback with current kernel/cifs against those with other
> servers (not just the usual Samba3, Samba4, current Windows).
> 
All I can get hold of easily is Samba3/4 on Linux, and probably Win2K. 
I /might/ be able to get hold of other stuff through work, but don't count 
on it. I'll see what I can do.


-- 
Jesper 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to