On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:05:09PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > There is no need to call pci_disable_msix() in case > the previous call to pci_enable_msix() failed
Hi Naresh, Arvind, Could you please review csiostor patches in this series? Thanks! > Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> > Cc: Naresh Kumar Inna <[email protected]> > Cc: Arvind Bhushan <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > --- > drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_isr.c | 4 +--- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_isr.c > b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_isr.c > index 7ee9777..91ba91d 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_isr.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_isr.c > @@ -529,10 +529,8 @@ csio_enable_msix(struct csio_hw *hw) > csio_reduce_sqsets(hw, cnt - extra); > } > } else { > - if (rv > 0) { > - pci_disable_msix(hw->pdev); > + if (rv > 0) > csio_info(hw, "Not using MSI-X, remainder:%d\n", rv); > - } > > kfree(entries); > return -ENOMEM; > -- > 1.7.7.6 > -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev [email protected] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
