On Út 15-03-05 15:42:09, john stultz wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 23:59 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > diff -Nru a/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c b/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c > > > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2005-03-11 17:02:30 -08:00 > > > +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2005-03-11 17:02:30 -08:00 > > > @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/smp_lock.h> > > > #include <linux/dmi.h> > > > #include <linux/suspend.h> > > > +#include <linux/timeofday.h> > > > > > > #include <asm/system.h> > > > #include <asm/uaccess.h> > > > @@ -1204,6 +1205,7 @@ > > > device_suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND); > > > device_power_down(PMSG_SUSPEND); > > > > > > + timeofday_suspend_hook(); > > > /* serialize with the timer interrupt */ > > > write_seqlock_irq(&xtime_lock); > > > > > > > Could you just register timeofday subsystem as a system device? Then > > device_power_down will call you automagically..... And you'll not have > > to modify apm, acpi, swsusp, ppc suspend, arm suspend, ... > > That may very well be the right way to go. At the moment I'm just very > hesitant of making any user-visible changes. > > What is the impact if a new system device name is created and then I > later change it? How stable is that interface supposed to be?
Changing its name is okay... your device probably will not have any user-accessible controls, right? Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/