On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe I wasn't clear; but I meant you should extend the lock tests to > cover the full qrwlock semantics. > > That means we also need tests like: > > RL(X1); > IRQ_ENTER(); > RL(X2); > IRQ_EXIT(); > > To fully validate that in_interrupt exception to fairness etc.. A bit off topic for this patch, however relevant for tests in general. Is there a reason why these locking selftests need to be under lib? Can they be consolidated under tools/testing/selftests? -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
