On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:24:17AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 04:16:20PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:14:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > <...>
> > > @@ -188,17 +193,21 @@ static void note_page(struct seq_file *m
> > > /*
> > > * Now print the actual finished series
> > > */
> > > - seq_printf(m, "0x%0*lx-0x%0*lx ",
> > > - width, st->start_address,
> > > - width, st->current_address);
> > > -
> > > - delta = (st->current_address - st->start_address) >> 10;
> > > - while (!(delta & 1023) && unit[1]) {
> > > - delta >>= 10;
> > > - unit++;
> > > + if (!st->marker->max_lines ||
> > > + st->lines < st->marker->max_lines) {
> > > + seq_printf(m, "0x%0*lx-0x%0*lx ",
> > > + width, st->start_address,
> > > + width, st->current_address);
> > > +
> > > + delta = (st->current_address - st->start_address) >> 10;
> > > + while (!(delta & 1023) && unit[1]) {
> > > + delta >>= 10;
> > > + unit++;
> > > + }
> > > + seq_printf(m, "%9lu%c ", delta, *unit);
> > > + printk_prot(m, st->current_prot, st->level);
> > > }
> > > - seq_printf(m, "%9lu%c ", delta, *unit);
> > > - printk_prot(m, st->current_prot, st->level);
> > > + st->lines++;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * We print markers for special areas of address space,
> >
> > Hmm... the original commit has a 2nd hunk here that does seem to be
> > applicable to 3.10. Was this dropped accidentally or on purpose?
>
> I don't remember at all, sorry. What is the hunk that I missed?
You are right, I somehow missed that, thanks. I've also now fixed up
the ">> 10" change as well. Good thing this is just in debugging code
:)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
