Any suggestion what's the right thing to do here David? I'd like to re-spin and re-submit the patches.
- M On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Milosz Tanski <[email protected]> wrote: > The honest answer is I don't know if it know if needs to be unlocked > before or after. I saw a same pattern with unlocking order inside of > __fscache_attr_changed in the failure case. > > If this can be re-ordered I can take care of that in my next version I > submit to you. > > - Milosz > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:37 AM, David Howells <[email protected]> wrote: >> Milosz Tanski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> + wake_cookie = __fscache_unuse_cookie(cookie); >>> spin_unlock(&cookie->lock); >>> + if (wake_cookie) >>> + __fscache_wake_unused_cookie(cookie); >> >> Why do __fscache_unuse_cookie() with cookie->lock held? >> >> David > > > > -- > Milosz Tanski > CTO > 16 East 34th Street, 15th floor > New York, NY 10016 > > p: 646-253-9055 > e: [email protected] -- Milosz Tanski CTO 16 East 34th Street, 15th floor New York, NY 10016 p: 646-253-9055 e: [email protected] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
