On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 14:54 +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> So, the proposal is to allocate memory independently for each
> Reply Queue and pass down all of the addresses to the firmware.
> Then the firmware will just take each address and program the value
> into the correct register.

trivial note:

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c
[]
> @@ -1179,17 +1184,22 @@ static int
>  _base_config_dma_addressing(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, struct pci_dev 
> *pdev)
>  {
>       struct sysinfo s;
> -     char *desc = NULL;
> +     u64 consistent_dma_mask;
> +
> +     if (dma_mask)
> +             consistent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> +     else
> +             consistent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>  
>       if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > 4) {
>               const uint64_t required_mask =
>                   dma_get_required_mask(&pdev->dev);
>               if ((required_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) && 
> !pci_set_dma_mask(pdev,
>                   DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
> -                 DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
> +                 consistent_dma_mask)) {

This would be easier to read if the embedded functions
within the if were on separate lines like:

                if ((required_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) &&
                    !pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) &&
                    !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, consistent_dma_mask)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to