On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:46:25AM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
> DC Servo register 57h holds the DC offset value after the hardware has
> completed the DC Servo Correction, so declare this register as volatile
> because it is changed by the hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikesh Oswal <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c          |    1 +
>  include/linux/mfd/wm8994/registers.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c
> index 2fbce9c..e775565 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-regmap.c
> @@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ static bool wm8958_volatile_register(struct device 
> *dev, unsigned int reg)
>       case WM8958_FW_MINOR_0:
>       case WM8958_FW_PATCH_1:
>       case WM8958_FW_PATCH_0:
> +     case WM8958_DC_SERVO:

I think you can just use the WM8994_DC_SERVO_4 define the
register is called DC Servo (4) in the datasheet.

Also would it be worth adding DC_SERVO_1 and DC_SERVO_READBACK as
they are being treated as volatile on 8994 and look identical in
the datasheet.

>               return true;
>       default:
>               return wm8994_volatile_register(dev, reg);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/registers.h 
> b/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/registers.h
> index db8cef3..85b4fec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/registers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/registers.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
>  #define WM8994_DC_SERVO_1                       0x54
>  #define WM8994_DC_SERVO_2                       0x55
>  #define WM8994_DC_SERVO_4                       0x57
> +#define WM8958_DC_SERVO                      0x57
>  #define WM8994_DC_SERVO_READBACK                0x58
>  #define WM8994_DC_SERVO_4E                   0x59
>  #define WM8994_ANALOGUE_HP_1                    0x60
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5

Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to