From: David Gibson <[email protected]>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 4710b2ba873692194c636811ceda398f95e02db2 upstream.

netxen_process_lro() contains two bounds checks.  One for the ring number
against the number of rings, and one for the Rx buffer ID against the
array of receive buffers.

Both of these have off-by-one errors, using > instead of >=. The correct
versions are used in netxen_process_rcv(), they're just wrong in
netxen_process_lro().

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c
index 7692dfd4f262..cc68657f0536 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c
@@ -1604,13 +1604,13 @@ netxen_process_lro(struct netxen_adapter *adapter,
        u32 seq_number;
        u8 vhdr_len = 0;
 
-       if (unlikely(ring > adapter->max_rds_rings))
+       if (unlikely(ring >= adapter->max_rds_rings))
                return NULL;
 
        rds_ring = &recv_ctx->rds_rings[ring];
 
        index = netxen_get_lro_sts_refhandle(sts_data0);
-       if (unlikely(index > rds_ring->num_desc))
+       if (unlikely(index >= rds_ring->num_desc))
                return NULL;
 
        buffer = &rds_ring->rx_buf_arr[index];
-- 
2.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to