On Monday 21 March 2005 05:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant, > > > kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine. > > > This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/ > > > > > > Since this is a fairly trivial change (and the same change made > > > everywhere) I've just made a single patch for all the files and CC all > > > authors/maintainers of those files I could find for comments. If > > > spliting this into one patch pr file is prefered, then I can easily do > > > that as well. > > > > [snip] > > > > > --- linux-2.6.11-mm4-orig/drivers/video/console/bitblit.c 2005-03-16 > > > 15:45:26.000000000 +0100 +++ > > > linux-2.6.11-mm4/drivers/video/console/bitblit.c 2005-03-19 > > > 22:27:39.000000000 +0100 @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ static void > > > bit_putcs(struct vc_data *vc > > > count -= cnt; > > > } > > > > > > - if (buf) > > > - kfree(buf); > > > + kfree(buf); > > > } > > > > This is performance critical, so I would like the check to remain. A > > comment may be added in this section. > > The first thing kfree() does is check for the NULL pointer. And since > kfree() is used a lot, it's probably already in the cache.
It's not the kfree that matters, but the fact that buf is almost always NULL. Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/