On 08/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > I belive that 9e7814404b77c3e8 "hold task->mempolicy while numa_maps scans" > was wrong and it doesn't fix the problem.
See 2/4. > I'll try to send the fix tomorrow, could you review the initial preparations? > To me, these changes make sense as cleanups in any case, but I don't really > understand this code and this was only compile tested. Untested again because I do not know how, please review ;) On top of "mempolicy: get_task_policy() cleanups/preparations" series. I'll send the final cleanups later. Oleg. fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 33 ++++++----------------- include/linux/mempolicy.h | 5 ++- mm/mempolicy.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
