On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:39:42AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:51:15AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > Would you mind to apply the same pgprot_modify() approach on the > clear_refs_write(), test and post the patch? > > Feel free to use my singed-off-by (or suggested-by if you prefer) once > it's tested (see merge case below).
Sure thing :-) > One thing: there could be (I haven't checked) complications on > vma_merge(): since vm_flags are identical it assumes that it can reuse > vma->vm_page_prot of expanded vma. But VM_SOFTDIRTY is excluded from > vm_flags compatibility check. What should we do with vm_page_prot there? Since the merged VMA will have VM_SOFTDIRTY set, it's OK that it's vm_page_prot won't be setup for write notifications. For the purpose of process migration, you'll just get some false positives, which is tolerable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
