On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:28:22 +0300
Andreea-Cristina Bernat <[email protected]> wrote:

> The uses of "rcu_assign_pointer()" are NULLing out the pointers.
> According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
> "1.   This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
> it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
> smaller overhead.
> 
> The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
> @@
> @@
> 
> - rcu_assign_pointer
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER
>   (..., NULL)

I guess I can add this. It's a very slow path thus it isn't critical.

Although, I hate the name. Perhaps we should add another macro called
RCU_CLEAR_POINTER() or something that just nulls it. That way it
documents the use. To me, INIT means the pointer is being initialized,
where in reality it's just being cleared. I guess one could argue that
the pointer is being "re-initialized".

Thanks!

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> index 759d5e0..4dc8b79 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static void unreg_event_syscall_enter(struct 
> ftrace_event_file *file,
>               return;
>       mutex_lock(&syscall_trace_lock);
>       tr->sys_refcount_enter--;
> -     rcu_assign_pointer(tr->enter_syscall_files[num], NULL);
> +     RCU_INIT_POINTER(tr->enter_syscall_files[num], NULL);
>       if (!tr->sys_refcount_enter)
>               unregister_trace_sys_enter(ftrace_syscall_enter, tr);
>       mutex_unlock(&syscall_trace_lock);
> @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static void unreg_event_syscall_exit(struct 
> ftrace_event_file *file,
>               return;
>       mutex_lock(&syscall_trace_lock);
>       tr->sys_refcount_exit--;
> -     rcu_assign_pointer(tr->exit_syscall_files[num], NULL);
> +     RCU_INIT_POINTER(tr->exit_syscall_files[num], NULL);
>       if (!tr->sys_refcount_exit)
>               unregister_trace_sys_exit(ftrace_syscall_exit, tr);
>       mutex_unlock(&syscall_trace_lock);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to