Hi!
> >Perhaps squashfs is good enough improvement over cramfs... But I'd
> >like those 4Gb limits to go away.
>
> So would I. But it is a totally groundless reason to refuse kernel
> submission because of that, Squashfs users are quite happily using it
> with such a "terrible" limitation. I'm asking for Squashfs to be put in
> the kernel _now_ because users are asking me to do it _now_. If it
Putting it into kernel because users want it is... not a good
reason. You should put it there if it is right thing to do. I believe
you should address those endianness issues and drop V1 support. If
breaking 4GB limit does not involve on-disk format change, it may be
okay to merge. After code is merged, doing format changes will be
hard...
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
