On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:01:14 +0300, Andrey Panin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 081, 03 22, 2005 at 02:13:45AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Monday 21 March 2005 10:31, Kenan Esau wrote: > > > Am Montag, den 21.03.2005, 09:52 -0500 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov: > > > > > > > > There are couple of things that I an concerned with: > > > > > > > > 1. I don't like that it overrides meaning of max_proto parameter to be > > > > exactly the protocol specified. > > > > > > Yeah -- I agree. I also don't like that double-meaning. That was the > > > reason why I originally proposed the use of a new parameter... > > > > > > > Ok, I have some patches to lifebook that I would like to included (if > > they work): > > > > 1. lifebook-dmi-x86-only - do not compile in DMI detection on anything > > but x86. > > On !x86 machines DMI functions will be optimized away and so you'll save only > few bytes in .init.data section. IMHO it's not worth additional ugly #ifdef's. >
It is not in .init.data, it is not discarded... Still probably OK to keep. Not quite sure. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
