On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Il 02/09/2014 18:44, David Matlack ha scritto:
>> >
>> > -#define MMIO_GEN_SHIFT                 19
>> > -#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT             9
>> > -#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK              ((1 << MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT) - 1)
>> > +#define MMIO_GEN_SHIFT                 20
>> > +#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT             10
>> > +#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK              ((1 << MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT) - 2)
>> >  #define MMIO_GEN_MASK                  ((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1)
>> >  #define MMIO_MAX_GEN                   ((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1)
>> >
>> > @@ -4428,7 +4432,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes(struct kvm *kvm)
>> >          * The very rare case: if the generation-number is round,
>> >          * zap all shadow pages.
>> >          */
>> > -       if (unlikely(kvm_current_mmio_generation(kvm) >= MMIO_MAX_GEN)) {
>> > +       if (unlikely(kvm_current_mmio_generation(kvm) == 0)) {
>>
>> This should be in patch 1/3.
>
> I don't think so.  This change is not due to the removal of biasing in
> x86.c, but rather due to removing bit 0 from MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK.
>
> I placed it here, because the previous test works just fine until bit 0
> is removed from MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK.

Ah ok, you're right.

>
> Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to