The Coveity checker found that residue is always 0.
Is this patch correct or should residue have been used?
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/ns83820.c.old 2005-03-22
21:32:15.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/ns83820.c 2005-03-22
21:33:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -1189,7 +1189,6 @@
for (;;) {
volatile u32 *desc = dev->tx_descs + (free_idx * DESC_SIZE);
- u32 residue = 0;
dprintk("frag[%3u]: %4u @ 0x%08Lx\n", free_idx, len,
(unsigned long long)buf);
@@ -1199,17 +1198,11 @@
desc_addr_set(desc + DESC_BUFPTR, buf);
desc[DESC_EXTSTS] = cpu_to_le32(extsts);
- cmdsts = ((nr_frags|residue) ? CMDSTS_MORE : do_intr ?
CMDSTS_INTR : 0);
+ cmdsts = ((nr_frags) ? CMDSTS_MORE : do_intr ? CMDSTS_INTR : 0);
cmdsts |= (desc == first_desc) ? 0 : CMDSTS_OWN;
cmdsts |= len;
desc[DESC_CMDSTS] = cpu_to_le32(cmdsts);
- if (residue) {
- buf += len;
- len = residue;
- continue;
- }
-
if (!nr_frags)
break;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
