Hello David Thanks for you comments, I thought it was a good idea that the same ioctl had the same value on all the arch, sorry to make a mess on your file :)
I have just resend a v2 of the patch. Regards! On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:26 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 20:08:30 +0200 > >> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h >> b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h >> index 897d172..4e1c5da 100644 >> --- a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h >> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h >> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ >> #define TIOCGPKT _IOR('T', 0x38, int) /* Get packet mode state */ >> #define TIOCGPTLCK _IOR('T', 0x39, int) /* Get Pty lock state */ >> #define TIOCGEXCL _IOR('T', 0x40, int) /* Get exclusive mode state */ >> +#define TIOCGRS485 0x542E >> +#define TIOCSRS485 0x542F > > Please follow the ioctl numbering scheme used by the particular > architecture UAPI file you are editing. > > Since Sparc here is using incrementing _IO*() values, including the type > for the object passed in/out of the ioctl, you should do similarly for > TIOC{G,S}RS485. -- Ricardo Ribalda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
