On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:37:26PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > >However, my approach doesn't need any check. The open() or pm_resume() > >can just call clk_prepare_enable() directly. The __clk_enable() will > >then handle the 'clk == NULL' case: > > Yes, I was thinking the same thing.
Because that's following your suggestion :) @Shengjiu Another thing I forgot to mention is we still need a return check for clk_prepare_enable() which isn't in the current version. And I said "doesn't need any check" is indicating the pre-check of the call. Thank you Nicolin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
