On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 September 2014 10:21, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> >> + /* dependent power supplies (e.g. battery) may have changed >>>> >> + * state as a result of this event, so poll again and hold >>>> >> + * the wakeup_source until all events are processed. >>>> >> + */ > > But isn't this comment still incorrect? Its not about dependent supplies > but the race between the work-handler and its enqueuing?
I believe you are correct: the code is to make sure we do not relax a wakeup source that has had multiple events queued, until all are notified to userspace. Todd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
