At 2014-09-04 02:04:24, "Mike Turquette" <[email protected]> wrote: >Quoting Chao Xie (2014-08-25 21:38:14) >> From: Chao Xie <[email protected]> >> >> The register used by clk-frac may be shared with >> other clocks. >> So it needs to use spin lock to protect the register >> access. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <[email protected]> > >This patch will break against the latest clk-next due to api changes. >You can see more here[0] and use this script to update your code if you >like[1]. > >Basically the calls to clk_set_rate need to be changed to >clk_provider_set_rate.
> I see the patch set [0] is V10 now, and it is not merged to clk-next yet. So should i wait for the patch set to be merged, then send out the updated patches? >[0] >http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<[email protected]> >[1] >http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-refactoring-9&id=ea48c0d655346cce26329523cf24574f9ea8feee > >Regards, >Mike N嫥叉靣笡y氊b瞂千v豝�)藓{.n�+壏{睉赙zXФ洝塄}财爖�&j:+v墾�珣赙zZ+€�+zf＂穐殘啳嗃iz� 畐ア�?櫒璀�&�)撷f旟^j谦y呩@A玜囤 0鹅h�鍜i
