The nm_i->fcnt checking is executed before spin_lock, so if another
thread delete the last free_nid from the list, the wrong nid may be
gotten.  So fix the race condition by moving the nm_i->fnct checking
into spin_lock.

Signed-off-by: Huang, Ying <[email protected]>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.h |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
@@ -115,9 +115,11 @@ static inline int next_free_nid(struct f
        struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
        struct free_nid *fnid;
 
-       if (nm_i->fcnt <= 0)
-               return -1;
        spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
+       if (nm_i->fcnt <= 0) {
+               spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
+               return -1;
+       }
        fnid = list_entry(nm_i->free_nid_list.next, struct free_nid, list);
        *nid = fnid->nid;
        spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to