On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> Add a simple getter pm_runtime_is_irq_safe() for quering whether runtime
> PM IRQ safe was set or not.
> 
> Various bus drivers implementing runtime PM may use choose to suspend
> differently based on IRQ safeness status of child driver (e.g. do not
> unprepare the clock if IRQ safe is not set).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> index 367f49b9a1c9..44d74f0f182e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,11 @@ static inline void pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(struct 
> device *dev)
>       ACCESS_ONCE(dev->power.last_busy) = jiffies;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +     return dev->power.irq_safe;
> +}
> +

If you add something to the runtime PM API, you must update the 
documentation file (Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt) 
correspondingly.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to