On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 18:13 -0500, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kim Phillips [mailto:kim.phill...@freescale.com] > > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 3:23 PM > > To: Alexander Graf > > Cc: Rivera Jose-B46482; <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; <a...@arndb.de>; > > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Yoder > > Stuart-B08248; Wood Scott-B07421; <linuxppc-rele...@linux.freescale.net> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers/bus: Added Freescale Management Complex > > APIs > > > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:14:03 +0200 > > Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > Am 18.09.2014 um 06:17 schrieb German Rivera > > > > <german.riv...@freescale.com>: > > > > > > > >> On 09/15/2014 06:44 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:34:21 -0500 > > > >> "J. German Rivera" <german.riv...@freescale.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> From: "J. German Rivera" <german.riv...@freescale.com> > > > >>> > > > >>> APIs to access the Management Complex (MC) hardware > > > >>> module of Freescale LS2 SoCs. This patch includes > > > >>> APIs to check the MC firmware version and to manipulate > > > >>> DPRC objects in the MC. > > > >>> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: J. German Rivera <german.riv...@freescale.com> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yo...@freescale.com> > > > >>> --- > > > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dpmng.c | 93 +++++ > > > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c | 504 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_dpmng_cmd.h | 83 ++++ > > > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_dprc_cmd.h | 545 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_mc_sys.c | 237 +++++++++++ > > > >>> include/linux/fsl_dpmng.h | 120 ++++++ > > > >>> include/linux/fsl_dprc.h | 790 > > > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > >>> include/linux/fsl_mc_cmd.h | 182 +++++++++ > > > >>> include/linux/fsl_mc_sys.h | 81 ++++ > > > >>> 9 files changed, 2635 insertions(+) > > > >>> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dpmng.c > > > >>> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c > > > >>> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_dpmng_cmd.h > > > >>> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_dprc_cmd.h > > > >>> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_mc_sys.c > > > >>> create mode 100644 include/linux/fsl_dpmng.h > > > >>> create mode 100644 include/linux/fsl_dprc.h > > > >>> create mode 100644 include/linux/fsl_mc_cmd.h > > > >>> create mode 100644 include/linux/fsl_mc_sys.h > > > >> > > > >> the fsl prefix in the filename fsl_dpmng_cmd.h is redundant with > > > >> its directory name fsl-mc/. Note that I find dashes ('-') in > > > >> filenames make them easier to type: is there a reason we're using > > > >> underscores here? > > > > This is a convention that we decided early on '-' for directory names > > > > and '_' for file names. > > > > based on what? > > We looked at how generally files were named in kernel source. > > For what it's worth in my 3.16 branch: > > $ find drivers/ -type f | grep '-' | wc -l > 4308 > $ find drivers/ -type f | grep '_' | wc -l > 6507 > > ...it seems that there are far more files named with underscores. If Greg > or Arnd wants the files renamed, fine, but other than that I see no reason > to change this.
60% isn't "far more". Regardless of whether we change this (dashes are easier to read, easier to type, and are what English normally uses -- underscores are for when you can't use a dash for technical reasons), let's not start making rules based on weak statistical inferences. Plus, why limit the search to drivers? E.g. if you looked at arch/ you'd reach the opposite conclusion. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/