This fixes a bug when using the SOC_DOUBLE_R_RANGE_TLV macro in
the invert mode. In the non-invert case, e.g.

SOC_DOUBLE_R_RANGE_TLV("<name>", <reg_l>, <reg_r>,
                                        0, 40, 255, 0, <tlv>)

the range sent to the hardware is 40..255, but in the invert case:

SOC_DOUBLE_R_RANGE_TLV("<name>", <reg_l>, <reg_r>,
                                        0, 40, 255, 1, <tlv>)

the range 215..0 was being sent to the hardware. This commit
corrects this to 255..40 so it is consistent with the non-invert
case.

Signed-off-by: Howard Mitchell <[email protected]>
---
 sound/soc/soc-core.c |   20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index d4bfd4a..6a58af3 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -3027,9 +3027,10 @@ int snd_soc_put_volsw_range(struct snd_kcontrol 
*kcontrol,
        unsigned int val, val_mask;
        int ret;
 
-       val = ((ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] + min) & mask);
        if (invert)
-               val = max - val;
+               val = (max - ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]) & mask;
+       else
+               val = ((ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] + min) & mask);
        val_mask = mask << shift;
        val = val << shift;
 
@@ -3038,9 +3039,10 @@ int snd_soc_put_volsw_range(struct snd_kcontrol 
*kcontrol,
                return ret;
 
        if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc)) {
-               val = ((ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] + min) & mask);
                if (invert)
-                       val = max - val;
+                       val = (max - ucontrol->value.integer.value[1]) & mask;
+               else
+                       val = ((ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] + min) & mask);
                val_mask = mask << shift;
                val = val << shift;
 
@@ -3085,8 +3087,9 @@ int snd_soc_get_volsw_range(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
        if (invert)
                ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
                        max - ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
-       ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
-               ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] - min;
+       else
+               ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
+                       ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] - min;
 
        if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc)) {
                ret = snd_soc_component_read(component, rreg, &val);
@@ -3097,8 +3100,9 @@ int snd_soc_get_volsw_range(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
                if (invert)
                        ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] =
                                max - ucontrol->value.integer.value[1];
-               ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] =
-                       ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] - min;
+               else
+                       ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] =
+                               ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] - min;
        }
 
        return 0;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to