Am 19.09.2014 17:29, schrieb Jeff Kirsher: > From: Mark Rustad <[email protected]> > > Silence nested-externs warnings for these, as these nested > externs are truly wanted. > > CC: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> > CC: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> > CC: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> > CC: Brian Norris <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/signal.h | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h > index 750196f..e68ae6b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/signal.h > +++ b/include/linux/signal.h > @@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ static inline int sigismember(sigset_t *set, int _sig) > > static inline int sigisemptyset(sigset_t *set) > { > + DIAG_PUSH DIAG_IGNORE(nested-externs)
Do we really want to clutter the source with such tags? Does this even build? i.e. how does gcc know to ignore that? rw@azrael:~/linux (ubi-wlcrash $)> git grep DIAG_PUSH | wc -l 0 Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
