There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
runs on a different kernel.  Although a part of the problem was solved
by the prior commit 0a7e6d1b6844 ("perf tools: Check recorded kernel
version when finding vmlinux"), there's a remaining problem still.

When perf records samples, it synthesizes the kernel map using
machine__mmap_name() and ref_reloc_sym like "[kernel.kallsyms]_text".
You can easily see it using 'perf report -D' command.

After finishing record, it goes through the recorded events to find
maps/dsos actually used.  And then record build-id info of them.

During this process, it needs to load symbols in a dso and it'd call
dso__load_vmlinux() since the default value of the symbol_conf.try_
vmlinux_path is true.  However it changes dso->long_name to a real
path of the vmlinux file (e.g. /lib/modules/3.16.0-rc2+/build/vmlinux)
if one is running on a custom kernel.

It resulted in that perf report reads the build-id of the vmlinux, but
cannot use it since it only knows about the [kernel.kallsyms] map.  It
then falls back to possible vmlinux paths by using the recorded kernel
version (in case of a recent version) or a running kernel silently.

Even with the recent tools, this still has a possibility of breaking
the result.  As the build directory is a symbolic link, if one built a
new kernel in the same directory with different source/config, the old
link to vmlinux will point the new file.  So it's absolutely needed to
use build-id when finding a kernel image.

In this patch, it's now changed to try to search a kernel dso using
"vmlinux" shortname (which always has a build-id) and, if not found,
search "[kernel.kallsyms]".

Before:

  $ perf report
  # Children      Self  Command  Shared Object      Symbol
  # ........  ........  .......  .................  
...............................
  #
      72.15%     0.00%  swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] set_curr_task_rt
      72.15%     0.00%  swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] native_calibrate_tsc
      72.15%     0.00%  swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] 
tsc_refine_calibration_work
      71.87%    71.87%  swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] module_finalize
   ...

After (for the same perf.data):

      72.15%     0.00%  swapper  vmlinux  [k] cpu_startup_entry
      72.15%     0.00%  swapper  vmlinux  [k] arch_cpu_idle
      72.15%     0.00%  swapper  vmlinux  [k] default_idle
      71.87%    71.87%  swapper  vmlinux  [k] native_safe_halt
   ...

Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/machine.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index b2ec38bf211e..14880b81e98c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -1062,8 +1062,22 @@ static int machine__process_kernel_mmap_event(struct 
machine *machine,
                 * Should be there already, from the build-id table in
                 * the header.
                 */
-               struct dso *kernel = __dsos__findnew(&machine->kernel_dsos,
-                                                    kmmap_prefix);
+               struct dso *kernel = NULL;
+               struct dso *dso;
+
+               list_for_each_entry(dso, &machine->kernel_dsos, node) {
+                       const char *suffix;
+
+                       suffix = dso->long_name + strlen(dso->long_name) - 3;
+                       if (strcmp(suffix, ".ko")) {
+                               kernel = dso;
+                               break;
+                       }
+               }
+
+               if (kernel == NULL)
+                       kernel = __dsos__findnew(&machine->kernel_dsos,
+                                                kmmap_prefix);
                if (kernel == NULL)
                        goto out_problem;
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to