Hi George,

This patch removes 'gpio_active_low' field of struct gpio_extcon_data.
But, include/linux/extcon-gpio.h has the description of 'gpio_active_low' field.

Also,
This patch has not included the any description/comment of removing 
'gpio_active_low'.

Also,
How to set 'FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW' bit for gpio when using platform data?
This patch don't call 'set_bit()' function to set FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW flag.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi

On 09/09/2014 01:14 PM, George Cherian wrote:
> Convert the driver to use gpiod_* API's.
> 
> Signed-off-by: George Cherian <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c | 18 +++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> index 72f19a3..25269f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@
>  
>  struct gpio_extcon_data {
>       struct extcon_dev *edev;
> -     unsigned gpio;
> -     bool gpio_active_low;
> +     struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
>       const char *state_on;
>       const char *state_off;
>       int irq;
> @@ -50,9 +49,7 @@ static void gpio_extcon_work(struct work_struct *work)
>               container_of(to_delayed_work(work), struct gpio_extcon_data,
>                            work);
>  
> -     state = gpio_get_value(data->gpio);
> -     if (data->gpio_active_low)
> -             state = !state;
> +     state = gpiod_get_value(data->gpiod);
>       extcon_set_state(data->edev, state);
>  }
>  
> @@ -106,22 +103,21 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       }
>       extcon_data->edev->name = pdata->name;
>  
> -     extcon_data->gpio = pdata->gpio;
> -     extcon_data->gpio_active_low = pdata->gpio_active_low;
> +     extcon_data->gpiod = gpio_to_desc(pdata->gpio);
>       extcon_data->state_on = pdata->state_on;
>       extcon_data->state_off = pdata->state_off;
>       extcon_data->check_on_resume = pdata->check_on_resume;
>       if (pdata->state_on && pdata->state_off)
>               extcon_data->edev->print_state = extcon_gpio_print_state;
>  
> -     ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, extcon_data->gpio, GPIOF_DIR_IN,
> +     ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, pdata->gpio, GPIOF_DIR_IN,
>                                   pdev->name);
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
>       if (pdata->debounce) {
> -             ret = gpio_set_debounce(extcon_data->gpio,
> -                                     pdata->debounce * 1000);
> +             ret = gpiod_set_debounce(extcon_data->gpiod,
> +                                      pdata->debounce * 1000);
>               if (ret < 0)
>                       extcon_data->debounce_jiffies =
>                               msecs_to_jiffies(pdata->debounce);
> @@ -133,7 +129,7 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>       INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&extcon_data->work, gpio_extcon_work);
>  
> -     extcon_data->irq = gpio_to_irq(extcon_data->gpio);
> +     extcon_data->irq = gpiod_to_irq(extcon_data->gpiod);
>       if (extcon_data->irq < 0)
>               return extcon_data->irq;
>  
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to