On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:32:05AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:53:09PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: > >> Use the much easier to read ACCESS_ONCE() which is basically the same > >> thing as > >> the cast to volatile. > >> > >> Please note the change in volatile cast: ACCESS_ONCE(v)->counter to > >> ACCESS_ONCE(v->counter). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > If you want to do something like so, then be consistent and do them all. > > Hi Peter, > > The changelog across all archs is as follows > > 18 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > Do you think it is better to send it as one patch or break up into > patch for each arch?
I'd send it as a single patch, its small enough as is, and basically just a 'style' update. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
