Commit-ID:  a5e7be3b28a235108c59561bea55eea1072b23b0
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a5e7be3b28a235108c59561bea55eea1072b23b0
Author:     Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:22:39 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:46:56 +0200

sched/deadline: Clear dl_entity params when setscheduling to different class

When a task is using SCHED_DEADLINE and the user setschedules it to a
different class its sched_dl_entity static parameters are not cleaned
up. This causes a bug if the user sets it back to SCHED_DEADLINE with
the same parameters again.  The problem resides in the check we
perform at the very beginning of dl_overflow():

        if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
                return 0;

This condition is met in the case depicted above, so the function
returns and dl_b->total_bw is not updated (the p->dl.dl_bw is not
added to it). After this, admission control is broken.

This patch fixes the thing, properly clearing static parameters for a
task that ceases to use SCHED_DEADLINE.

Reported-by: Daniele Alessandrelli <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Vincent Legout <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Luca Abeni <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Vincent Legout <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <[email protected]>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |  2 ++
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index a284190..09bde2a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1809,6 +1809,20 @@ int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int 
state)
 }
 
 /*
+ * This function clears the sched_dl_entity static params.
+ */
+void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+       struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+
+       dl_se->dl_runtime = 0;
+       dl_se->dl_deadline = 0;
+       dl_se->dl_period = 0;
+       dl_se->flags = 0;
+       dl_se->dl_bw = 0;
+}
+
+/*
  * Perform scheduler related setup for a newly forked process p.
  * p is forked by current.
  *
@@ -1832,10 +1846,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, 
struct task_struct *p)
 
        RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->dl.rb_node);
        hrtimer_init(&p->dl.dl_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
-       p->dl.dl_runtime = p->dl.runtime = 0;
-       p->dl.dl_deadline = p->dl.deadline = 0;
-       p->dl.dl_period = 0;
-       p->dl.flags = 0;
+       __dl_clear_params(p);
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rt.run_list);
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index aaa5abb..efb9412 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1565,6 +1565,8 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct 
task_struct *p)
        if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.dl_timer) && !dl_policy(p->policy))
                hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
 
+       __dl_clear_params(p);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
        /*
         * Since this might be the only -deadline task on the rq,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1bc6aad..76f3a38 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ struct rt_bandwidth {
        u64                     rt_runtime;
        struct hrtimer          rt_period_timer;
 };
+
+void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p);
+
 /*
  * To keep the bandwidth of -deadline tasks and groups under control
  * we need some place where:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to