On 09/24/2014 01:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:06:02PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:+static ssize_t durations_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + char *buf) +{ + struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + if (chip->vendor.duration[TPM_LONG] == 0) + return 0; + + return sprintf(buf, "%d %d %d [%s]\n", + jiffies_to_usecs(chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT]), + jiffies_to_usecs(chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM]), + jiffies_to_usecs(chip->vendor.duration[TPM_LONG]), + chip->vendor.duration_adjusted + ? "adjusted" : "original"); +} +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(durations);Seem useless since the durations are constant, drop it?
We show them for TPM 1.2 as well, so I'd keep them fo TPM2.
+static ssize_t timeouts_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + char *buf) +{ + struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + return sprintf(buf, "%d %d %d %d [%s]\n", + jiffies_to_usecs(chip->vendor.timeout_a), + jiffies_to_usecs(chip->vendor.timeout_b), + jiffies_to_usecs(chip->vendor.timeout_c), + jiffies_to_usecs(chip->vendor.timeout_d), + chip->vendor.timeout_adjusted + ? "adjusted" : "original"); +} +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(timeouts);
With all the problems we had with TPM 1.2 TPM's wrong timeouts and showing them in sysfs, why not show them for TPM2 as well?
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
