On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 07:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> In the following patch extract, one line is indented with spaces rather
> than tabs. Is it intentional that checkpatch doesn't complain about this,
> I guess due to the line being a comment?
[]
> struct bcm_hdr_suppression_contextinfo {
> - UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionInBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS]; /* Intermediate buffer
> to accumulate pkt Header for PHS */
> - UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionOutBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS + PHSI_LEN]; /*
> Intermediate buffer containing pkt Header after PHS */
> + /* Intermediate buffer to accumulate pkt Header for PHS */
> + UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionInBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS];
> + /* Intermediate buffer containing pkt Header after PHS */
> + UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionOutBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS + PHSI_LEN];
> };
checkpatch does not care when comments start in any
particular position or ensure comments have tabs
preceding them.
Does anyone care?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
