On Friday, September 26, 2014 09:54:00 AM Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 08:24 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> > (the hazards of multitasking.. post escaped early, and went to mostly
> > the wrong folks)
> > 
> > 
> > While testing some scheduler patches, the below pcc-cpufreq
> > might_sleep() gripe fell out.
> 
> Because the bits below from 8fec051e didn't make the lock go away first.
> Reverting only pcc-cpufreq back to notifier.. works.
> 
> --------------------- drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c 
> ---------------------

Are you sure this is the right file?

Shouldn't that be pcc-cpufreq.c rather?

Also moving the spin_lock(&pcc_lock) after the cpufreq_freq_transition_begin()
should fix the problem too (like the below).  Have you tried that?


---
 drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
@@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ static int pcc_cpufreq_target(struct cpu
        u32 input_buffer;
        int cpu;
 
-       spin_lock(&pcc_lock);
        cpu = policy->cpu;
        pcc_cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(pcc_cpu_info, cpu);
 
@@ -216,6 +215,7 @@ static int pcc_cpufreq_target(struct cpu
        freqs.old = policy->cur;
        freqs.new = target_freq;
        cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
+       spin_lock(&pcc_lock);
 
        input_buffer = 0x1 | (((target_freq * 100)
                               / (ioread32(&pcch_hdr->nominal) * 1000)) << 8);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to