(2014/10/01 2:58), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hi Fengguang,
> 
> On 09/30, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Oleg,
>>
>> 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
>>
>> commit 8b4d801b2b123b6c09742f861fe44a8527b84d47
>> Author:     Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
>> AuthorDate: Thu Jun 20 17:50:06 2013 +0200
>> Commit:     Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>> CommitDate: Thu Jun 20 17:57:00 2013 +0200
>>
>>     hw_breakpoint: Fix cpu check in task_bp_pinned(cpu)
>>
>>     trinity fuzzer triggered WARN_ONCE("Can't find any breakpoint
>>     slot") in arch_install_hw_breakpoint() but the problem is not
>>     arch-specific.
>>
>>     The problem is, task_bp_pinned(cpu) checks "cpu == iter->cpu"
>>     but this doesn't account the "all cpus" events with iter->cpu <
>>     0.
>>
>>     This means that, say, register_user_hw_breakpoint(tsk) can
>>     happily create the arbitrary number > HBP_NUM of breakpoints
>>     which can not be activated. toggle_bp_task_slot() is equally
>>     wrong by the same reason and nr_task_bp_pinned[] can have
>>     negative entries.
>>
>>     Simple test:
>>
>>      # perl -e 'sleep 1 while 1' &
>>      # perf record -e mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10 -p `pidof 
>> perl`
>>
>>     Before this patch this triggers the same problem/WARN_ON(),
>>     after the patch it correctly fails with -ENOSPC.
>>
>>     Reported-by: Vince Weaver <[email protected]>
>>     Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
>>     Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
>>     Cc: <[email protected]>
>>     Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>>
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------------+
>> |                                                                       | 
>> 003002e04e | 8b4d801b2b | v3.17-rc7_093000 |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------------+
>> | boot_successes                                                        | 60 
>>         | 0          | 0                |
>> | boot_failures                                                         | 0  
>>         | 20         | 11               |
>> | WARNING:at_kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:kprobe_trace_self_tests_init() | 0  
>>         | 20         | 11               |
>> | backtrace:kprobe_trace_self_tests_init                                | 0  
>>         | 20         | 11               |
>> | backtrace:warn_slowpath_null                                          | 0  
>>         | 20         | 11               |
>> | backtrace:kernel_init_freeable                                        | 0  
>>         | 20         | 11               |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------------+
>>
>> [    4.188679] Testing kprobe tracing:
>> [    4.189810] Could not insert probe at kprobe_trace_selftest_target+0: -22
> 
> __register_trace_kprobe() fails.
> 
> No, I am very sure this can't be caused by the commit above. If nothing else,
> task_bp_pinned() changed by this commit is not even called in this case.

Uh, right. I'm trying to reproduce this to analyze...

Anyway, I'd like to remove the whole of kprobe_trace selftest from the
kernel binary. Instead of that, we already have ftracetest scripts.
We can run the test after the kernel booted.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: [email protected]


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to