On Wednesday 01 October 2014 01:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Some driver in gpio still check for return value from gpiochip_remove >> Get rid of the check for return value. >> >> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> >> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <[email protected]> > > This is already fixed in the GPIO tree, and in linux-next. > > I have got more patches like this from other people, and cannot > quite understand what kind of tree you are actually looking at? > Sorry for this Linus. I have applied these patches on linux-next's 3.17-rc6. Just checked the other patch fixing these have come after rc6. Should have done on master or gpio tree master.
Will be more careful next time. > Yours, > Linus Walleij > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
