3.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Weston Andros Adamson <d...@primarydata.com>

commit 411a99adffb4f993eee29759f744de01487044ac upstream.

Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <d...@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c |    5 ++---
 fs/nfs/write.c                 |   15 ++++-----------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
@@ -1015,6 +1015,7 @@ static u32 select_bucket_index(struct nf
 
 /* The generic layer is about to remove the req from the commit list.
  * If this will make the bucket empty, it will need to put the lseg reference.
+ * Note this is must be called holding the inode (/cinfo) lock
  */
 static void
 filelayout_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_page *req,
@@ -1022,7 +1023,6 @@ filelayout_clear_request_commit(struct n
 {
        struct pnfs_layout_segment *freeme = NULL;
 
-       spin_lock(cinfo->lock);
        if (!test_and_clear_bit(PG_COMMIT_TO_DS, &req->wb_flags))
                goto out;
        cinfo->ds->nwritten--;
@@ -1037,8 +1037,7 @@ filelayout_clear_request_commit(struct n
        }
 out:
        nfs_request_remove_commit_list(req, cinfo);
-       spin_unlock(cinfo->lock);
-       pnfs_put_lseg(freeme);
+       pnfs_put_lseg_async(freeme);
 }
 
 static struct list_head *
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -379,8 +379,6 @@ nfs_destroy_unlinked_subrequests(struct
                subreq->wb_head = subreq;
                subreq->wb_this_page = subreq;
 
-               nfs_clear_request_commit(subreq);
-
                /* subreq is now totally disconnected from page group or any
                 * write / commit lists. last chance to wake any waiters */
                nfs_unlock_request(subreq);
@@ -490,7 +488,7 @@ try_again:
         * Commit list removal accounting is done after locks are dropped */
        subreq = head;
        do {
-               nfs_list_remove_request(subreq);
+               nfs_clear_request_commit(subreq);
                subreq = subreq->wb_this_page;
        } while (subreq != head);
 
@@ -520,15 +518,11 @@ try_again:
 
        nfs_page_group_unlock(head);
 
-       /* drop lock to clear_request_commit the head req and clean up
-        * requests on destroy list */
+       /* drop lock to clean uprequests on destroy list */
        spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
        nfs_destroy_unlinked_subrequests(destroy_list, head);
 
-       /* clean up commit list state */
-       nfs_clear_request_commit(head);
-
        /* still holds ref on head from nfs_page_find_head_request_locked
         * and still has lock on head from lock loop */
        return head;
@@ -810,6 +804,7 @@ nfs_clear_page_commit(struct page *page)
        dec_bdi_stat(page_file_mapping(page)->backing_dev_info, 
BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
 }
 
+/* Called holding inode (/cinfo) lock */
 static void
 nfs_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_page *req)
 {
@@ -819,9 +814,7 @@ nfs_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_page
 
                nfs_init_cinfo_from_inode(&cinfo, inode);
                if (!pnfs_clear_request_commit(req, &cinfo)) {
-                       spin_lock(cinfo.lock);
                        nfs_request_remove_commit_list(req, &cinfo);
-                       spin_unlock(cinfo.lock);
                }
                nfs_clear_page_commit(req->wb_page);
        }
@@ -1040,9 +1033,9 @@ static struct nfs_page *nfs_try_to_updat
        else
                req->wb_bytes = rqend - req->wb_offset;
 out_unlock:
-       spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
        if (req)
                nfs_clear_request_commit(req);
+       spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
        return req;
 out_flushme:
        spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to