Similar to the stop_machine deadlock scenario on !PREEMPT kernels
addressed in b22ce2785d97 "workqueue: cond_resched() after processing
each work item", kworker threads requeueing back-to-back with zero jiffy
delay can stall RCU. The cond_resched call introduced in that fix will
yield only iff there are other higher priority tasks to run, so force a
quiescent RCU state between work items.

Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawre...@stratus.com>
Link: 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140926105227.01325...@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com
Link: 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140929115445.40221...@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com
Fixes: b22ce2785d97 ("workqueue: cond_resched() after processing each work 
item")
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5dbe22a..345bec9 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2043,8 +2043,10 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
         * kernels, where a requeueing work item waiting for something to
         * happen could deadlock with stop_machine as such work item could
         * indefinitely requeue itself while all other CPUs are trapped in
-        * stop_machine.
+        * stop_machine. At the same time, report a quiescent RCU state so
+        * the same condition doesn't freeze RCU.
         */
+       rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
        cond_resched();
 
        spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to